A sculptor student asked about how one does images of trees and further how to simplify them as the complexity of painting a million leaves can make an artist batty. Some painters and sculptors want to paint every leaf...bless them...for the rest of us this mini-lesson is about
A. Making realistic trees
B. Simplifying those trees in our images (paintings, drawings, sculpture)
First there are countless kinds of trees and then millions of
variations within those -- two shown here, they couldn't be more different
(above left: photo of wide tree.......above right bare trees from my painting "Snow Gardens" below:)
We could go on and on with many other tree shapes, sizes and variations, but
let's focus on one tree, analyze it in the following steps:
I. Let's figure out how to make the tree real
II. Let's explore how to simplify the real tree we create in various degrees of simplicity
______________________________________________________________________
On the left below is a photo of a row of Magnolia
trees... confusing, right?
As a reference for a painting...lets analyze one tree:
1. The original photo
2. That photo made more contrasty to start to
see the form better revealed (this is done here with photo manipulation
in sketching in nature you would squint your eyes to achieve this effect)
3. I did a 3d model of the tree to show its basic underlying form
A tree - like everything we see, has a basic form or a series of
basic forms as its
understructure. Students often get lost, particularly with trees, in painting
each leaf...while to make it real
its underlying structure needs to be communicated.
To make an object seem solid, one needs to understand the following:
Study the above and also the mini-Lessons on Form (click on the blue links
below):
One needs to mass the tones in groups based on the above-- the darkest tones on the shadow sides of objects, middle tones in the transitions from light to dark and the lighted tones in the most light stuck areas of an object.
Just below is a painting of a group of leaves from the tree
photographed above (you can paint the rest of the tree
in this level of detail - I'm just not going to do it...it would take almost
forever)
Now lets explore how to paint the tree simpler, then still
simpler:
on the left is the original photo, then a simpler painted version, then an even
simpler version on the extreme right:
Left is a reprise of the source photo from above......then, the tree painted to be round in lots of colors and values.... then the another interpretation SIMPLIFIED---into three tonal masses
In my paintings above, I eliminated the sky and simplified the outer shape of the tree to better demonstrate the principals of form and the simplification.
In the right hand most simplified tree, I used only THREE color
mixtures
to paint the tree
On the left hand side is the transitional middles tone
Up through the middle is the light struck tone...then some middle tones again to
step down from the high tones of the light struck leaf masses.... and...on the right side
I have massed the darks...the resulting tree is simple but solid...no details,
not painted leaf by leaf
POSTERIZED: Simpler still-- areas are divided into a few colors - tree leaf area into just light stuck side and shadow side
(See Wikipedia definition of "POSTERIZATION" at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posterization
_____________________________________________________
The ultimate simplification- silhouette...First in black and white...
Then - silhouetted "forest" in color:
The trees in the foreground are darker and more vibrant (more intense color green... while the taller "forest" behind is a lighter and bluer, less intense color blue-green--- this is a reflection of the concept of "atmospheric perspective"...as things get further from the viewer's eye... they get light in tone, less chromatic (color intensive) and have less contrast (see mini Online Lesson 4) for a fuller exploration of atmospheric perspective.
To see examples of simplified trees -see the work of these painters and photographers:
Edward Hopper*
http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/MCG/FH536~Gas-1940-Posters.jpg
http://ursispaltenstein.ch/blog/images/uploads_img/hopper_2.jpg
http://www.tate.org.uk/research/tateresearch/tatepapers/06autumn/images/jenkins_fig2large.jpg
_______________________________________________ and
Fairfield Porter
http://www.tfaoi.com/am/10am/10am132.jpg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/ec/Fairfield_Porter's_painting_'Under_the_Elms',_1971_-_1972.jpg/300px-Fairfield_Porter's_painting_'Under_the_Elms',_1971_-_1972.jpg
http://www.tfaoi.com/cm/3cm/3cm617.jpg
also:
Fairfield Porter on Mark Harden's "Artchive"
Painting titled "Amherst Campus":
http://www.artchive.com/artchive/P/porter/porter_amherst.jpg.html
Fairfield Porter on:
The Bridgeman Art Library:
http://www.bridgeman.co.uk/search/s_results.asp?search=fairfield+porter&stype=all&order=5&page=&view=2
_______________________________________________ and
Ansel Adams
http://www.blognow.com.au/uploads/l/Llennodo/19959.jpg
http://doors.stanford.edu/ansel-adams/iceberg-panorama.jpg
* A note about Edward Hopper, the great American Illustrator and Painter - he was a master of "leaving out", or simplifying... you can see it in his trees, his people, his houses and interiors...he leaves out detail...one fact few observers notice is that there is no glass in any windows Hopper ever painted. Study his most famous paining "Nighthawks" a picture of people seen in a late night diner in Manhattan, NYC through windows - NO GLASS.(Yes, there is a hint of it at the far left where the window curves around the corner - but not in the large part of the diner window and also, look across the street at the shop windows
"Nighthawks" can be seen on the Artchive web site at:
http://www.artchive.com/artchive/H/hopper/nighthwk.jpg.html
Look at the other Hoppers on the Artchive site like "Chop Suey"
http://www.artchive.com/artchive/H/hopper.html
Once you get to the Hopper bio at the page above, click on the "VIEW IMAGE LIST"
To sign up for the course, click here.
© 2008 Barry Waldman
